On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 11:09:40AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > On 10/2/25 11:05 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 10:49:21AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > >>> Forgot to add: But I think Zhi explained that this is not necessary and > >>> can be > >>> controlled by the VFIO driver, i.e. the PCI driver that binds to the VF > >>> itself. > >> > >> Yes, this is the direction that I originally (3 whole days ago, haha) had > >> in mind, > >> after talking with Zhi and a few others: nova-core handles PFs, and the > >> VFIO driver > >> handles the VFs, and use the "is virtual" logic to sort them out. > > > > To be clear, no matter what the VFIO driver bound to the VF should not > > become entangled with any aux devices. > > I was fine until you said "aux devices". :) What does that mean in this > context?
Something using struct auxiliary_device Jason
