On 8/29/25 2:46 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On 8/29/25 11:38 PM, John Hubbard wrote: >> On 8/28/25 6:59 AM, Danilo Krummrich wrote: >>> On 8/28/25 3:25 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>>> On Wed Aug 27, 2025 at 8:12 AM JST, John Hubbard wrote: >>>> <snip> >>> makes a little more sense if this patch simply introduces the example as an >>> example for vendor_id() itself. >>> >>> I think struct Vendor does not necessarily need an example by itself. >> >> I'm not quite sure if you are asking for a change to this patch? The >> example already exercises .vendor_id(), so...? > > Yes, I think the example above should be on the vendor_id() method rather than > on the Vendor struct and should be introduced by this patch.
ohhh, so located directly above it. I finally get it. haha. I'll do that, thanks. :) thanks, -- John Hubbard
