On Sat, 2025-08-09 at 13:12 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > Are there any GPUs in the field today which technically are supported, but yet > refused by GSP due to this?
I don't think so. This issue was discovered through a combination of an internal board with a new PCI ID as well as code inspection. The consensus is that GSP-RM should not be rejecting boards by default. That is, RMDevidCheckIgnore=1 should be the default behavior of GSP-RM. > > Fortunately, GSP-RM supports an undocumented registry key that tells it > > to ignore the mismatch. In such cases, the product name returned will > > be a blank string, but otherwise GSP-RM will continue. > > I assume you refer to internal documentation when you say "undocumented"? No, I'm referring to public documentation.
