On 8/5/25 6:26 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: ... > This leaves us with two viable solutions: `Alignable` extension trait > with `align_up` and `align_down` operations that take an `Alignment` as > parameter (with the caveat that they could not be const for now), or a
>From a readability point of view, this first option sounds nice. It's clear, concise, and doesn't involve macros. thanks, -- John Hubbard > set of per-type functions defined using a macro, similar to bit/genmask. > I am fine with both but don't know which one would be preferred, can the > R4L leadership provide some guidance? :) >
