On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 3:59 PM Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Similarly, if they stabilize the `Alignment` one (only) and we end up > > only using our `PowerOfTwo<T>` for `usize` and those use cases, then > > we should consider using the upstream one (and adding any/all methods > > that we need). > > `Alignment` is very close to what we need, so I don't see a reason to > not adopt the same name at the very least. > > This reminds me that I should also check whether upstream Rust would be > interested in `prev_multiple_of` and `last_set_bit`. The docs I've read > for contributing looked a bit intimidating, with RFCs to write and all. > Would you have a pointer for where I should start? Maybe a Zulip thread?
If you want to add a new library function, the correct procedure would be opening an ACP, which is more light-weight than the RFC process: https://std-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/development/feature-lifecycle.html RFCs are mainly for much bigger changes. Alice
