Am Sa., 15. Juni 2024 um 19:57 Uhr schrieb David Bremner <[email protected]>: > > Marc Fargas <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi again, > > > > El dom. 24 de mar. 2024, Marc escribió: > >> El mié. 13 de mar. 2024, Carl escribió: > >>> (...) > >>> Could you put your fix together in the form of a git-appliable patch? > >>> Such as by applying it to the notmuch source, running `git commit` and > >>> then `git format-patch HEAD~` or similar. > >> > >> Please disregard the previous patch, consider the one attached > >> here. Hope I did the "format-patch" thing properly. > >> > >> I had to move the `without-restriction` call to the top of the > >> `with-temporary-notmuch-message-buffer` defmacro. It does work properly > >> now. > > Applied to master. Sorry for the long-ish silence. >
Does this depend on emacs version by any chance, i.e. is `without-restriction` defined on all emacsen? In Fedora's copr infrastructure, all builds succeed but some tests fail with `Symbol'€™s function definition is void: without-restriction`. The picture is the following: PASS: centos-stream+epel-next-8 with emacs 26.1-11.el8 rhel+epel-8 with emacs 26.1-11.el8 fedora-39 with emacs 29.3-1.fc39 (plus all newer fedoras) FAIL: centos-stream+epel-next-9 with emacs 27.2-9.el9 rhel+epel-9 with emacs 27.2-9.el9 Yes, RHEL 8 is EOled. I find it strange that tests pass on both emacs 26 and 29 but not 27.2. But said code path is not executed on emacs 26 at all? The failing 42 tests are mostly around json and crypto, but not all. Cheers Michael _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
