Kevin Boulain <[email protected]> writes: > > Thoughts? Should clients using the library gate every function call to > Notmuch behind a lock instead?
Ideally that should not be necessary. On the other hand, it may take some time to fix issues with concurrent access. > I can also start a discussion in sfsexp's issue tracker. Yes please. I guess in worst case we can implment come kind of concurrency control to sfsexp (wrap calls in libnotmuch inside some mutex), although that sounds pretty far from ideal. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
