Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> writes: >> ++e +f id:%yy >> +# the next line should report an an empty tag error for batch tagging, but >> restore >> ++ +e -- id:20091117232137.GA7669 at griffis1.net > > I don't follow the comment above: do you mean "but not for restore", or > it should report an error but restore anyway or?
the former, it should read "but not for restore" d
