On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:12:16 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote: > In fact, I'm now starting to think we don't need to add any support > for special tagging operations (such as "deleted") even if we *do* > have support for suppressing them in the CLI. Special tagging > operations should only be supported if the tagged messages are somehow > handled specially. If not, then again, we should just leave them up > to the user [0].
Agreed. The more interesting patch is the one that maps from the 'deleted' tag to the 'T' bit, at least as someone who is mostly maildir-ignorant it seems that way. The keybindings are easy for a user to play with. The behaviour of the core library much less so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120111/56b5339a/attachment-0001.pgp>
