On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:25:43 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal at jhu.edu> wrote: > The one thing I would suggest is adding a level of customizability, > instead of hardcoding in "deleted". > i.e.: > > (defvar notmuch-delete-tag "deleted") > > and then: > > (if delete > (notmuch-show-add-tag notmuch-delete-tag)) > > > The less we force specific tags on users, it seems to me, the better.
Hey, Jesse. There's been some discussion on this, and I think Carl's position (sorry if I'm putting words in your mouth, Carl) was to just settle on the tag "deleted" for this concept (of deleted messages) and stick with it. I tend to agree with that position. I think it's better to just pick a tag for this and stick with it, and "deleted" is as good as any. If we allow customization on this level then I think things are going to get confusing and harder to support down the line. Jesse, can you think of a reason why it would really be better to allow customization for this? jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100421/10d1f98b/attachment.pgp>
