[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jens Geyer resolved THRIFT-6179.
--------------------------------
      Assignee: Jens Geyer
    Resolution: Fixed

> C++ WebSocket server recurses once per Ping frame with no depth bound
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-6179
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-6179
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: C++ - Library
>            Reporter: Jens Geyer
>            Assignee: Jens Geyer
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 0.25.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> TWebSocketServer::readFrame answers a Ping by calling itself 
> (lib/cpp/src/thrift/transport/TWebSocketServer.h):
>     case Opcode::Ping:
>       pong();
>       return readFrame();
> A Ping carries no data for the caller, so the reader has to move on to the 
> next frame to satisfy it. Doing that by re-entering readFrame costs one stack 
> frame per Ping, and nothing bounds how many a peer may send.
> Measured against master, with a client sending Ping frames of one payload 
> byte -- 7 bytes each on the wire -- followed by one ordinary data frame:
>   20,000 pings (140 kB)  ->  3,200,344 bytes of stack
>   40,000 pings (280 kB)  ->  6,400,344 bytes of stack
>   60,000 pings (420 kB)  ->  segmentation fault
> That is 160 bytes of stack per 7 bytes of input, and an 8 MB stack -- the 
> Linux default -- is exhausted somewhere around 52,000 pings, roughly 366 kB. 
> It is not build-dependent: gcc 11 does not eliminate the call at -O2 any more 
> than at -O0, and both builds fault at the same point.
> A loop reads every frame from the same depth. No new configuration is 
> involved and no legitimate traffic changes: pings are still answered, one 
> after another, for as long as a peer cares to send them.
> Note for whoever picks this up: a Ping with no payload does not currently 
> reach this path at all, because readFrame does not consume the four 
> masking-key bytes of a zero-length masked frame and the stream desynchronises 
> on the next header instead. That is a separate defect, filed separately; the 
> measurements above use one-byte pings so that they exercise this one.
> Test in lib/cpp/test/TWebSocketServerTest.cpp: a run of pings followed by a 
> data frame is read with the data frame intact, and the transport underneath 
> reports the depth the reader reached.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to