vy commented on PR #408: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-parent/pull/408#issuecomment-2957905799
@ppkarwasz, I am very much favor of reverting #366 instead, which has the following motivation: > It would be nice (and more secure) to have a fixed set of Antora dependencies that is only upgraded during `logging-parent` releases. I read this as _"good to have, but nothing critical"_. We increased complexity in #366, now we will even increase it more because #366 broke something. This adds two more extra steps to the release process – you know my stance on this: don't! As I shared with you in private, I am very concerned about the recent _"good-to-have, yet not really needed"_ features. Log4j doesn't have full-time employed maintainers. Increasing complexity without solid justification will only make the life of existing maintainers more difficult. I suggest reverting #367 (implementing #366) and closing this PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
