ppkarwasz commented on PR #9: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-site/pull/9#issuecomment-2893323324
> Currently the website built in Jekyll or Antora? Currently the website is deployed from many repositories as you can see in the [INFRA site checker](https://infra-reports.apache.org/#sitesource). Let me give you three examples: - `https://logging.apache.org/` and the subfolders `blog`, `doaps` and `xml` are generated using Jekyll from this repo. - `https://logging.apache.org/log4j/` and the subfolders `1.x`, `2.3.x`, `2.12.x` and `extras` are static legacy content kept in the [`logging-log4j-site`](https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-site/tree/asf-site) repository. - `https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/` and most other Log4j and Log4net websites use Antora. Personally I am not particularly attached to a particular website generator, but the styles used in the Jekyll website are hard to read. For example the [Security Page](https://logging.apache.org/security.html), which is an important part of the website looks like a big blob of unstructured text, with small font sizes and overly long lines. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
