ppkarwasz commented on PR #3228: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3228#issuecomment-2805698294
> will this have any [backward compatibility] implications on the fat JAR users? I am not sure what implications are you thinking about. Yes, their fat JARs will be a couple of KiB bigger. **Note**: I didn't replace the JPMS `requires static org.jspecify` with `requires org.jspecify`, so if JPMS or OSGi user don't want it, they can exclude it. Fat JAR users of course are not JPMS users. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
