ppkarwasz commented on code in PR #3418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3418#discussion_r1932324793


##########
log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/util/internal/InternalLoggerRegistry.java:
##########
@@ -147,44 +147,43 @@ public Logger computeIfAbsent(
             return logger;
         }
 
+        // Creating a logger is expensive and might cause lookups and locks, 
possibly deadlocks:
+        // https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3252
+        // https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3399
+        //
+        // Creating loggers without a lock, allows multiple threads to create 
loggers in parallel, which also
+        // improves performance.
+        // Since all loggers with the same parameters are equivalent, we can 
safely return the logger from the
+        // thread that finishes first.
+        Logger newLogger = loggerSupplier.apply(name, messageFactory);

Review Comment:
   I use `newLogger` in a lambda, so it must be effectively `final`.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to