ppkarwasz commented on issue #3119:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3119#issuecomment-2563424332

   @szegedi,
   > I have a fix at https://github.com/szegedi/nashorn/tree/fix-logging-2. 
Unfortunately, I had to revert part of your fix and reintroduce the 
DISABLED_LOGGER, although this time it is _explicitly_ disabled regardless of 
the underlying logging library.
   > 
   > The logging in Nashorn is quite an architectural mess, as we need a 
Context (of which you can have more than one) to initialize a static 
(MethodHandleFactory.FUNC.) Right now all I have energy for is fixing it like 
this.
   
   Thank you for the help and the fix! I can confirm (a little bit late) that 
Nashorn 15.6 works correctly with Log4j Core. We introduced an integration test 
apache/logging-log4j-samples#251 to prevent regressions.
   
   The use of `DISABLED_LOGGER` is a perfect workaround for now: there are bugs 
on our side that cause an infinite recursion if Nashorn is used to filter log 
events and calls `Logger.isEnabledFor` at the same time (#3335) :wink:


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to