jesmith17 commented on PR #3322: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3322#issuecomment-2562039323
I agree that there is a slippery slope here, but specifying a table name for a db connection in the connection string is very very odd. Allowing the collection name via config instead of connection string puts this in line how the JDBC appender works which required a table name as part of the config. I would actually prefer to make this a config only part and have it override the connection string value. With the way the code currently functions you have to extract the db and collection name from the connection string to pass them to other code blocks anyway. But to preserve backwards compatibility I left it in. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
