ppkarwasz commented on PR #3219: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3219#issuecomment-2487803625
> Before attempting an upgrade, we were wondering, does this feature need to be updated? We are missing some context, what is being checked by using this runner? Any help in this regard is greatly appreciated. Thank you! Since PAX Exam is basically dormant, it would be better to move those tests to a different framework, but honestly I don't know which. @HannesWell, any suggestions? Frameworks like [Testcontainer for Java](https://java.testcontainers.org/) or [Arquillian](https://arquillian.org/) are not very OSGi friendly. The "new" [`osgi-test`](https://github.com/eclipse-osgi-technology/osgi-test) assumes that the test is already running in an OSGi environment. Maybe we could use something like [laeubisoft/osgi-test-framework](https://github.com/laeubisoft/osgi-test-framework) or the [BND Testing Plugin](https://github.com/bndtools/bnd/blob/master/maven-plugins/bnd-testing-maven-plugin/README.md). I will experiment with the latter. We already use BND plugins and they work well. I would like to keep the list of Open Source vendors we rely on minimal. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
