Chealer commented on code in PR #2581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/2581#discussion_r1611575204


##########
src/site/antora/modules/ROOT/partials/log4j-features.adoc:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+////
+    Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+    contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+    this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+    The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+    (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+    the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+         http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+    Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+    distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+    WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+    See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+    limitations under the License.
+////
+
+Batteries included::
+Log4j bundles a rich set of components to assist various use cases.
+* xref:manual/appenders.adoc[Appenders] targeting files, network sockets, 
databases, SMTP servers, etc.
+* xref:manual/layouts.adoc[Layouts] that can render CSV, HTML, JSON, Syslog, 
etc. formatted outputs
+* xref:manual/filters.adoc[Filters] based on log event rates, regular 
expressions, scripts, time, etc.
+* xref:manual/lookups.adoc[Lookups] for accessing system properties, 
environment variables, log event fields, etc.
+
+API separation::
+The API for Log4j (i.e., `log4j-api`) is separate from the implementation 
(i.e., `log4j-core`), making it straightforward for application developers 
which classes and methods to use while ensuring forward compatibility.

Review Comment:
   > I think this whole paragraph doesn't make sense at all on the benefits of 
API-vs-implementation separation. I will rewrite this.
   
   I believe it can make sense, but you're right that it's at best unclear. I 
would suggest something closer to:
   
   > In addition to the Log4j Core reference implementation, Log4j provides a 
stable facade (i.e., `log4j-api`) which is separate from that implementation, 
making it straightforward for developers to use Log4j while being confident on 
a high degree of API forward-compatibility.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to