[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17614084#comment-17614084
]
Strainu commented on LOG4J2-3614:
---------------------------------
Note that regardless of the fact that this was just a bugfix and not a new
feature, I still think a nanosecond example in table 2 of
[https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/json-template-layout.html] would
be welcomed.
> Update documentation after LOG4J2-3075
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-3614
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-3614
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 2.17.2
> Reporter: Strainu
> Assignee: Volkan Yazici
> Priority: Minor
>
> After LOG4J2-3075 was implemented, the JsonTemplateLayout timestamp resolver
> documentation should be updated to reflect the new feature.
> It's especially important to do so since the second fragment identifier used
> here ('S') is different from the one described in, e.g.
> [https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html] (which is 'n'). I
> don't have enough experience with Log4j to determine if this inconsistency is
> a bug or not, but an entry in the JsonTemplateLayout documentation would
> help.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
