nturner commented on pull request #62: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4cxx/pull/62#issuecomment-921184615
Sorry; been busy. Yes, @rm5248, if I use a configuration like the example in LOGCXX-523, logging appears to continue. That approach results in a more complex configuration (2x the number of appenders) and the failure behavior isn't as graceful. Since the specific conditions where fork() is likely to fail are pretty well understood and the appropriate behavior in the context of GZCompressAction is pretty straightforward, I think I'll stick with the approach in this PR in my own local builds of log4cxx. Perhaps it's not good enough for upstream -- that's fine. :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
