carterkozak commented on pull request #485: URL: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/485#issuecomment-816747383
> It's a shame we're exposing a blocking q API there, or we could've used JCTools/JCTools#340 to batch consume from the queue. We could support a lighter weight API with the ability to utilize both BlockingQueue (retaining backwards compatibility) as well as https://github.com/JCTools/JCTools/issues/340, what do you think? Alternatively a separate JCToolsAsyncAppender is an option. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
