Copilot commented on code in PR #2253: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2253#discussion_r2146303223
########## src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java: ########## @@ -2685,7 +2685,8 @@ && isStringType(getType(nameExpr))) { .peek(candidate -> checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(expression, candidate)) // GROOVY-11365 .map (candidate -> { ClassNode returnType = candidate.getReturnType(); - if (!candidate.isStatic() && GenericsUtils.hasUnresolvedGenerics(returnType)) { + if (!isStaticInContext(candidate) // GROOVY-11683 Review Comment: [nitpick] The inline comment splits the conditional and can reduce readability; consider moving `// GROOVY-11683` to its own line above the `if` statement or into a Javadoc comment for clarity. ```suggestion // GROOVY-11683 if (!isStaticInContext(candidate) ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@groovy.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org