Copilot commented on code in PR #2253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2253#discussion_r2146303223
##########
src/main/java/org/codehaus/groovy/transform/stc/StaticTypeCheckingVisitor.java:
##########
@@ -2685,7 +2685,8 @@ && isStringType(getType(nameExpr))) {
.peek(candidate ->
checkOrMarkPrivateAccess(expression, candidate)) // GROOVY-11365
.map (candidate -> {
ClassNode returnType = candidate.getReturnType();
- if (!candidate.isStatic() &&
GenericsUtils.hasUnresolvedGenerics(returnType)) {
+ if (!isStaticInContext(candidate) // GROOVY-11683
Review Comment:
[nitpick] The inline comment splits the conditional and can reduce
readability; consider moving `// GROOVY-11683` to its own line above the `if`
statement or into a Javadoc comment for clarity.
```suggestion
// GROOVY-11683
if (!isStaticInContext(candidate)
```
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@groovy.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
