[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17955649#comment-17955649
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11690:
-----------------------------------------

codecov-commenter commented on PR #2246:
URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2246#issuecomment-2930052621

   ## 
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/2246?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 Report
   All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
   > Project coverage is 69.0456%. Comparing base 
[(`e42a2a7`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/commit/e42a2a7dc3973a9c4007c4247e58360e95d02e5c?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 to head 
[(`a07b49f`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/commit/a07b49f972b0a15f414c683c17e04601ef743942?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
   
   <details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
   
   
   [![Impacted file tree 
graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/2246/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=1r45138NfQ&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/2246?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
   
   ```diff
   @@                Coverage Diff                 @@
   ##               master      #2246        +/-   ##
   ==================================================
   + Coverage     69.0395%   69.0456%   +0.0061%     
   - Complexity      29709      29712         +3     
   ==================================================
     Files            1423       1423                
     Lines          114407     114407                
     Branches        19842      19842                
   ==================================================
   + Hits            78986      78993         +7     
   + Misses          28788      28784         -4     
   + Partials         6633       6630         -3     
   ```
   
   | [Files with missing 
lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/2246?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
 | Coverage Δ | |
   |---|---|---|
   | 
[...n/java/org/codehaus/groovy/control/SourceUnit.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/2246?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=src%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcodehaus%2Fgroovy%2Fcontrol%2FSourceUnit.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#diff-c3JjL21haW4vamF2YS9vcmcvY29kZWhhdXMvZ3Jvb3Z5L2NvbnRyb2wvU291cmNlVW5pdC5qYXZh)
 | `71.9512% <100.0000%> (-1.2195%)` | :arrow_down: |
   
   ... and [3 files with indirect coverage 
changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/groovy/pull/2246/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
   
   </details>
   <details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
   
   - :snowflake: [Test 
Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests, 
report on failures, and find test suite problems.
   - :package: [JS Bundle 
Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save 
yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
   </details>




> Slightly expanded error messages
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-11690
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11690
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Paul King
>            Assignee: Paul King
>            Priority: Major
>
> Consider the following script (with intentional errors since we can't 
> multiply strings):
> {code:groovy}
> @TypeChecked
> def method() {
>     def alphabet = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789'
>     def alphabet2 = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789' * 
> 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
>     def alphabet3 = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789' + '' * 
> 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
> }
> {code}
> When reporting on the first error we don't truncate at all:
> {noformat}
> [Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method 
> java.lang.String#multiply(java.lang.String). Please check...
>  @ line 4, column 21.
>        def alphabet2 = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789' * 
> 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'
>                        ^
> {noformat}
> For the second, since the error position is above position 40, we shrink the 
> output taking 30 chars before and (up to) 10 after the position where the 
> error occurs. It becomes quite minimal context and seems a quite drastic 
> truncation given we don't care how long the above non-truncated string may be:
> {noformat}
> [Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method 
> java.lang.String#multiply(java.lang.String). Please check...
>  @ line 5, column 62.
>    klmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789' + '' * 'abcd
>                                  ^
> {noformat}
> This kind of truncation was possibly justified when we were thinking of 80 x 
> 24 terminals as our lowest common denominator for screen real estate, but 
> seems a little excessive these days.
> Instead of 40, 30 and 10, I propose we use 60, 45 and 25, a very modest 
> increase. This then gives a little more context:
> {noformat}
> [Static type checking] - Cannot find matching method 
> java.lang.String#multiply(java.lang.String). Please check...
>  @ line 5, column 62.
>    3 = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789' + '' * 'abcdefghijklmnopqrs
>                                                 ^
> {noformat}
> I am open to further discussion about what the correct numbers should be but 
> the above suggestion seemed to be a "no-brainer" as a little improvement.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to