[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17953971#comment-17953971 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GROOVY-11676: ----------------------------------------- paulk-asert commented on PR #2232: URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2232#issuecomment-2908353260 +1 > Method reference using class name results in bogus error message > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GROOVY-11676 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11676 > Project: Groovy > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.0.26 > Reporter: Christopher Smith > Assignee: Eric Milles > Priority: Minor > > I am writing a processing pipeline using {{with}} as a map-step. Since > {{with}} still does not accept {{{}Function{}}}, I am using method > references. I had a functional pipeline like this: > {code:groovy} > gremlin.V() /* stuff */ > .with(Queries.&whoamiTraversal) > .with(Queries.&processTraversal) > {code} > This worked correctly when the methods were static. However, I changed > {{processTraversal}} to be a non-static method, and I should have changed the > invocation to {{this.&processTraversal}}. Instead, the STC did not complain, > and I received a runtime error > {code} > groovy.lang.MissingMethodException: No signature of method: > org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.MethodClosure.processTraversal() is applicable > for argument types: ... > {code} > Instead of pointing at {{MethodClosure}}, the error message should indicate > where the actual problem is. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)