[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17885170#comment-17885170 ]
Christopher Smith commented on GROOVY-11451: -------------------------------------------- Sorry, I've been heads-down on a work ticket. The bug was replicating on a Java class. I'm afraid it looks like either I've lost track of the Git branch where it was or I deleted the case after posting it here. Based on the code snippet where I have the ticket number commented (I do this to mark locations with workarounds to take out later), the offending call site is in non-Spock code. > IncompatibleClassChange with map-style constructor and overloaded setters > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GROOVY-11451 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11451 > Project: Groovy > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Static compilation > Affects Versions: 4.0.22 > Reporter: Christopher Smith > Assignee: Eric Milles > Priority: Critical > > I have a POJO that I use from Groovy code. After adding a setter overload, I > now get {{IncompatibleClassChange}} at runtime because the static compiler > generates {{ScriptBytecodeAdapter.setGroovyObjectProperty}} instead of a > plain setter call. > {code} > public class Entity { > public void setId(String id) {} > public void setId(UUID id) {} > } > class EntityTest extends Specification { > @CompileStatic > Entity createEntity(String id) { > new Entity(id: id) // uses ScriptBytecodeAdapter.setGroovyObjectProperty > } > } > {code} > The error is not encountered when calling {{setId(id)}} or using {{entity.id > = id}}, without static compilation, or when the setter is not overloaded. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)