[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17215448#comment-17215448
 ] 

Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9373:
-------------------------------------

The last time I had a look at this, there was not enough ASM API to determine 
if a label is reachable or a branch is terminal.  Without that, we would need 
to walk the bytecode to make these determinations.  I have a stash if you'd 
like to see it pushed to a branch for inspection.

> ASM: rework line numbers for blocks with fast-path, try/catch or return 
> statement insertion
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GROOVY-9373
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9373
>             Project: Groovy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.18, 2.5.9, 3.0.0-rc-3
>            Reporter: Eric Milles
>            Assignee: Eric Milles
>            Priority: Major
>
> GROOVY-4063, GROOVY-4505, GROOVY-7647, GROOVY-8742, GROOVY-9076, GROOVY-9126 
> and GROOVY-9199 present (possibly) conflicting concerns.  Code coverage 
> metrics are thrown off when line number information exists outside of the 
> reachable paths in the bytecode.  Debug break and step exhibit strange 
> behaviors when the bytecode contains insufficient or duplicated line number 
> information.
> Can the ASM changes in StatementWriter be reworked to address these concerns?
> See also https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/884



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to