On Sunday, March 1, 2015, Bucky 'Igneous' Wolfe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My only real issue with Andrew's suggestion is hosted infra managed by a > single person is probably not the greatest idea (in terms of webapp > availability and human availability). If you wanted to push the code to a > free heroku dyno (belonging to an nlug org), I think that'd probably be a > happy medium. > > I'm obviously still in favor of gh-pages, but that's only because I think > we'd see more contributions from nlug members (Jekyll being a much lower > learning curve, in my biased opinion). GitHub Pages or not, though, there's > nothing preventing us from creating an nlug org for member projects. > > -Igneous > > Andrew likes Jekyll too, and has even suggested we use it recently in groups like 2600 (where there's a compelling security interest in having static pages). That's why it's curious to me he wants something else here. I seriously doubt NLUG needs more functionality than Github pages provides. Hell, I've got a network-enabled terminal running on mine, and could do all sorts of other things like interactive games, etc., if I just took the time. It's not really that limiting. Amber Adams -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
