Hey Aleks, > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366559 > > In the firefox thread are some concerns about cpu usage vs bandwith savings. > Do you have done some tests from this point of view?
That thread is quite old and a lot of the comments there might apply to the original Brotli implementation, which was quite slow, compared to what was released recently. Anyway, Brotli Team did some benchmarks: http://www.gstatic.com/b/brotlidocs/brotli-2015-09-22.pdf ...and there are more numbers in the Chromium thread: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=452335 At this point, Brotli is pretty much always a better choice. Compared to gzip, at the same compression level, you get significantly better compression ratio and comparable (or slightly faster) decompression speed, at the cost of compression speed... And if you're concerned with CPU usage (i.e. compression speed on the server side), you might just lower the compression level and you'll most likely get better compression ratio and faster compression speed than with gzip at higher level. Also, don't forget to pre-compress your static assets at brotli 11! :) Note: Brotli is still being actively worked on, so this will only get better over time ;) Best regards, Piotr Sikora _______________________________________________ nginx mailing list nginx@nginx.org http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx
