On Sunday 18 April 2010 02:02:59 pm, Richard Welty wrote: > i'd tend stick with a physical verification standard. even in areas > which i'm fairly > confident in the data, i've been surprised by mistakes often enough that > i think > it's pretty unsafe to remove the tags for ways you haven't checked.
This is what I do as well. I only remove tiger:reviewed when I've personal knowledge of the area, or have physically checked it. Satellite photography is often outdated, if not misleading or wrong. -- Samat K Jain <http://samat.org/> | GPG: 0x4A456FBA A ship in a port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for. -- Grace Murray Hopper (600) _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
