On Feb 26, 2011, at 1:34 AM, Praveen A wrote:
>
> I would like to highlight this part:
>
> "The prevalence in the revolts of social network tools, such as
> Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter, are symptoms, not causes, of this
> structure. These are the modes of expression of an intelligent
> population capable of organising autonomously."
>
>
Funny, when I read this the same passage jumped out at me, but perhaps for a
different reason. Sadly, Hardt and Negri perpetuate in this passage the
over-simple account of agency and causality in relation to media. The logical
or causal opposition between humans and "social network tools" puts all of the
agency, intelligence, and powers of coalition on the side of the human, while
media and technologies are merely instruments or tools of an autonomous human
agency ("Guns don't kill people; people kill people."). Hardt and Negri's
position here, sadly, is not much further advanced than reflection theory.
Bring me instead the machinic assemblages of Deleuze, Guattari, or Lazzarato,
or other attempts to do the more difficult work of understanding the complex
and heterogeneous forces that coalesce in the emergence of these inspiring
events.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [email protected]
