Mistakenly sent direct to me mail is attached.
B.
--- Begin Message ---
Its clear to me!
No matter, i'm still interested in develop javascript engine for netsurf..
Can we use some conde from V8 o something like?
P.D. Which GTK version do you use for development, i've got some problems
compiling netsurf 2.8
------- MESSAGE INCLUDED ----
M.CONFIG: JPEG (libjpeg) enabled (NETSURF_USE_JPEG := YES)
M.CONFIG: JNG/MNG/PNG (libmng) disabled (NETSURF_USE_MNG := NO)
M.CONFIG: PDF export (haru) disabled (NETSURF_USE_HARU_PDF := NO)
M.CONFIG: glibc internal iconv enabled (NETSURF_USE_LIBICONV_PLUG
:= YES)
M.CONFIG: SVG (librsvg-2.0) auto-enabled (NETSURF_USE_RSVG := AUTO)
M.CONFIG: SVG (libsvgtiny) auto-disabled (NETSURF_USE_NSSVG := AUTO)
M.CONFIG: Sprite (librosprite) auto-disabled (NETSURF_USE_ROSPRITE :=
AUTO)
M.CONFIG: BMP (libnsbmp) enabled (NETSURF_USE_BMP := YES)
M.CONFIG: GIF (libnsgif) enabled (NETSURF_USE_GIF := YES)
M.CONFIG: PNG (libpng) enabled (NETSURF_USE_PNG := YES)
M.CONFIG: WebP (libwebp) disabled (NETSURF_USE_WEBP := NO)
Package lcms was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `lcms.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'lcms' found
make[1]: se ingresa al directorio
`/public/Descargas/netsurf/netsurf-2.8/netsurf-2.8'
TESTMENT: unchanged
LINK: nsgtk
build-Linux-gtk/gtk_compat.o: In function
`nsgtk_combo_box_text_get_active_text':
/public/Descargas/netsurf/netsurf-2.8/netsurf-2.8/gtk/compat.c:122:
undefined reference to `gtk_combo_box_text_get_type'
---- FROM MAKE ----
2012/3/7 Rob Kendrick <[email protected]>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:50:08AM -0700, Carlitos Esquer wrote:
> > Hello folks:
> >
> > I'm interested in develop javascrtip for netsurf, but besides that i 've
> > got another proposal for you.
> > Why don't develop a browser with another script language. We can use
> ruby,
> > which is one of those languages, in my humble opinion, created for the
> job.
>
> No, no, no, no :) There's useful implementation of Ruby (ie, fast,
> small, self-contained, memory-efficient, history of good security), and
> given to the nearest hundredth of a percent nobody uses NetSurf, trying
> to use it to spearhead something like this will get you nowhere.
>
> > May it will be revolutionary as Rails.
>
> You mean the thing that's recently had a security flaw discovered in it
> simular to that even the PHP people realised was a bad idea a decade
> ago? :)
>
> > May be not, but we can try.
>
> I won't stop you.
>
> > Including Ruby will be not so hard, cause is designed to be used like
> that.
>
> Although it has a significantly less nice API and is less portable than,
> say, Lua.
>
> > We need to separate the DOM from each page and let the scriupts to create
> > the objects needed for manipulation.
>
> Right: so the first job is to implement a DOM. This is language
> agnostic, and is a lot of work.
>
> > Ruby supports well Gtk2 after all.
>
> This isn't relevent to NetSurf.
>
> B.
>
>
--- End Message ---
