Hi Juergen, Thank you for the update!
I believe the conversation right now is with the AD. Best regards, Kent // shepherd > On Aug 7, 2024, at 6:43 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2024-08-07, at 09:59, Jürgen Schönwälder > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It is what it is. > > I agree that this is a valid approach for keeping YANG-XML and YANG-JSON > forward compatible; date/times do not need to be ISO 8601 compatible to be > useful YANG data. > > Separately, for generating a good stand-in spec for YANG-CBOR (which allows > binary representation of dates and timestamps), it would be good to have some > more information about how the timezone-offset is used in practice in the > YANG ecosystem. I haven’t done a proper survey (lacking a corpus to work > from), but anecdotical I’m seeing examples with Z in place of a > timezone-offset that appear to target the semantics of -00:00 (which is what > RFC 9557 recognizes as the de-factor meaning of Z). > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
