Hi Jan,

> On Feb 28, 2024, at 9:21 AM, Jan Lindblad <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Med, author team,
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to get this work done, and well done! This is 
> one of those fundamental bricks that saves time and improves quality for the 
> entire YANG community.
> 
> I read the -09 version and like what I see. I have a couple of minor 
> suggestions you might consider.
> 
> + In section 3.4 about tree diagrams, the section text is already advocating 
> intermixing smaller tree snippets with explanations (which is great), but I 
> wish we could say that 
> tree diagrams of entire modules SHOULD NOT be included. Just a waste of 
> forest and attention span, imho.

The client-server suite of drafts takes this idea a step further, by many times 
using unexpanded tree-diagrams, along with associated hyperlinks to where the 
grouping was defined.  

For instance: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server#section-4.1.2.1


> + In section 4.2 about choice of prefixes, it is said that "Prefix values 
> SHOULD be short but are also likely to be unique." I used to say the same 
> thing. In recent years, however, I have started to stress the importance of 
> uniqueness much more. I'd say something like "Prefix values SHOULD be 
> selected carefully to be unique, and ideally not too long." The reason for my 
> change is I have met several engineers who have been deeply confused (to the 
> point of costing real money) when the same prefix has shown up in multiple 
> places. It's just an unnecessary part of the learning curve associated with 
> YANG.
> 
> In fact, I have started to recommend people to set the prefix to equal the 
> module name. This also solves another problem, which is that the "prefixes" 
> you see in RESTCONF are module names, and the confusion of what to use where 
> is sometimes suffocating. I understand if many think I'm going overboard 
> here, but when we pretend that modules don't have prefixes, only module 
> names, there is a lot less friction in learning the ropes.

In my private modules, I’ve taken to setting the prefix to be the same as the 
module name.

The clarity is great, and I don’t see an issue with the verbosity.  Something 
to consider?


Kent


> + In section 4.6.2 regarding useless (in YANG Context) functions in the XPath 
> function library, it is said that the "YANG compiler" should return false, 
> etc. Better wording might be that the XPath execution environment (or 
> something) should return false, etc. The YANG compiler is not even running 
> when the calls to those functions are happening.
> 
> + In section 4.11.5 regarding booleans, it is said that booleans can take 
> values true and false. This is true in mathematics :-) but in YANG a boolean 
> leaf can additionally take the "value" of "not set". Actually, "not set" is a 
> possibility for leafs in general, unless it is declared mandatory true, or 
> has a default. In my experience, one of the most common YANG modeling issues 
> is when people model a leaf foo, which isn't mandatory, has no default and 
> the description statement does not say what happens if the leaf is not set. 
> In many cases, there is a sort of natural meaning, but with booleans leafs in 
> particular, the absence of the leaf is typically highly ambiguous. I think 
> this hole merits a recommendation clause in the I-D.
> 
> Best Regards,
> /jan
> 
> 
> 
>> On 28 Feb 2024, at 10:51, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all, 
>> 
>> I think that this version is ready for the WGLC.
>> 
>> The document fully covers the items promised when requesting adoption [1]. 
>> As listed in the ACK section, we also solicited and integrated feedback from 
>> many yangdoctors, solicited SAAG WG to review the security text, etc. Refer 
>> to 1.1 for a comprehensive list of the changes.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Med
>> 
>> [1] Slide#7 of 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/slides-117-netmod-7-guidelines-for-authors-and-reviewers-of-documents-containing-yang-data-models-00
>>  
>> 
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : I-D-Announce <[email protected]> De la part de
>>> [email protected]
>>> Envoyé : mercredi 28 février 2024 10:01
>>> À : [email protected]
>>> Cc : [email protected]
>>> Objet : I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09.txt
>>> 
>>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09.txt is now available.
>>> It is a work item of the Network Modeling (NETMOD) WG of the IETF.
>>> 
>>>   Title:   Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents
>>> Containing YANG Data Models
>>>   Authors: Andy Bierman
>>>            Mohamed Boucadair
>>>            Qin Wu
>>>   Name:    draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-09.txt
>>>   Pages:   84
>>>   Dates:   2024-02-28
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> 
>>>   This memo provides guidelines for authors and reviewers of
>>>   specifications containing YANG modules, including IANA-maintained
>>>   modules.  Recommendations and procedures are defined, which are
>>>   intended to increase interoperability and usability of Network
>>>   Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) and RESTCONF protocol
>>>   implementations that utilize YANG modules.  This document obsoletes
>>>   RFC 8407.
>>> 
>>>   Also, this document updates RFC 8126 by providing additional
>>>   guidelines for writing the IANA considerations for RFCs that
>>> specify
>>>   IANA-maintained modules.
>>> 
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata
>>> tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-
>>> rfc8407bis%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C51672231
>>> 30c943a5a4c608dc383bce6b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C
>>> 638447076716455966%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjo
>>> iV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=s5VX9Hb%2Fl
>>> P9v5QurysF69syyEyba9yYss7xd7K5E2FE%3D&reserved=0
>>> 
>>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
>>> ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-
>>> 09.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C5167223130c943
>>> a5a4c608dc383bce6b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638447
>>> 076716464395%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
>>> zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Br3nHahSq8OV24f
>>> hFxBkJaqY43Q0GUxcbPZSFhji4uk%3D&reserved=0
>>> 
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fauth
>>> or-tools.ietf.org%2Fiddiff%3Furl2%3Ddraft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-
>>> 09&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C5167223130c943a5a4c
>>> 608dc383bce6b%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63844707671
>>> 6470644%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC
>>> JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zo%2FrtFJrYJkJXOceIpzR
>>> mlGAQF2c8m9Z%2F0vShl5o8gQ%3D&reserved=0
>>> 
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
>> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
>> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
>> falsifie. Merci.
>> 
>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
>> information that may be protected by law;
>> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and 
>> delete this message and its attachments.
>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
>> modified, changed or falsified.
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to