On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:56:58PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > > Best of luck with the request, and I'm fascinated to know why this is > > considered a sensible way to run UDP.... > > One can easily run DNS this way, for load balancing, etc.
Can you come up with a scenario for this DNS case? Do you mean that I send a DNS query to A and B would give me the answer? But, anyway, If you do SNAT for the outgoing UDP packets, what prevents you to do DNAT for the _unrelated_ incoming UDP packets? Or maybe I don't understand you question well? Ramin > Marc.
