From: Murali Karicheri <m-kariche...@ti.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:13:10 -0500
> On 02/16/2016 03:24 PM, David Miller wrote: >> >> I would like some of the feedback to be taken into consideration and >> integrated into this patch. >> >> Part of the reason this regression was introduced was probably because >> the purpose of some fields or descriptor semantics was not defined >> properly. >> >> Therefore it is absolutely appropriate to properly name and document >> these fields as part of the bug fix. >> >> Thank you. >> > David, > > I will take over this from Grygorii as he is out of office. > > I propose to keep this patch as is and add additional patch to address > the feedback in the same series (v1). Is that fine with you? No, I want the code to be clarified along with the bug fix so that this bug is unlikely to resurface.
