On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 23:52:10 -0800, Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com> wrote:
@@ -888,6 +888,8 @@ void ktime_get_snapshot(struct system_time_snapshot *systime_snapshot)
        s64 nsec_real;
        cycle_t now;

+       WARN_ON(timekeeping_suspended);
...
-       WARN_ON_ONCE(timekeeping_suspended);

Is this change intentional?

Yes it is. The code I replaced in pps_kernel.h (pps_get_ts()) has two call paths depending on whether CONFIG_NTP_PPS is set. On one call path (realtime only, config unset) WARN_ON(), from getnstimeofday64, is used, on the other WARN_ON_ONCE(), from ktime_get_raw_and_real_ts64(), is used. I opted for the greater verbosity of the two when I combined the code.

Is WARN_ON_ONCE() better here?

Thanks,
Chris

Reply via email to