From: Rainer Weikusat <rweiku...@mobileactivedefense.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:37:27 +0000
> The unix_dgram_sendmsg routine use the following test
>
> if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
>
> to determine if sk and other are in an n:1 association (either
> established via connect or by using sendto to send messages to an
> unrelated socket identified by address). This isn't correct as the
> specified address could have been bound to the sending socket itself or
> because this socket could have been connected to itself by the time of
> the unix_peer_get but disconnected before the unix_state_lock(other). In
> both cases, the if-block would be entered despite other == sk which
> might either block the sender unintentionally or lead to trying to unlock
> the same spin lock twice for a non-blocking send. Add a other != sk
> check to guard against this.
>
> Fixes: 7d267278a9ec ("unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue")
> Reported-By: Philipp Hahn <pmh...@pmhahn.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweiku...@mobileactivedefense.com>
Also applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
