Le 10/02/2016 12:59, David Ahern a écrit :
On 2/10/16 12:15 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
[snip]
Instead of removing completly the sysctl entries, another idea could be to
manage a group of interfaces which will share the same subtree.
This come out from a side conversation as well -- for example to have interfaces
enslaved to a bridge or bond share the same devconf.
It could also be interesting to have another way to group interfaces. For
example, group all ppp interfaces.
This is certainly possible to do and I can give it a look. The key point is that
we clearly need a means to lighten the overhead of a network interface.
Yes, I agree.
