From: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com> Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:44:32 +0200
> On 2/2/2016 5:26 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> We added here a patch from Matan and Alaa for addressing Linus >> comments on >> the mess w.r.t reserved field names in the driver/firmware >> auto-generated file. >> >> Once the patch hits linus tree, we'll ask Doug to rebase his tree on >> that >> rc so both net-next and rdma-next development for 4.6 will be done >> under >> the fixed robust form. > > Hi Dave, > > We've identified few places in the auto generated file where the > naming conversion > of reserved fields was not fully applied. Since the patch only did > re-naming of > reserved fields which are not used for existing functionality, the > testing we did > under the modified header file didn't catch that... > > We'll respin the patch and series. Ok.
