Le 02/02/2016 10:08, Daniel Borkmann a écrit :
On 02/02/2016 05:51 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:01:45 +0000
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dich...@6wind.com> wrote:
diff --git a/tc/tc_bpf.c b/tc/tc_bpf.c
index 42c8841869f5..219ffa582c1a 100644
--- a/tc/tc_bpf.c
+++ b/tc/tc_bpf.c
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
#include "tc_util.h"
#include "tc_bpf.h"
+#ifndef AF_ALG
+#define AF_ALG 38
+#endif
Why is this here? AF_ALG is not used anywhere in this code.
It is used, this patch is fine as-is.
Yes, it's used and not defined with old toolchains:
$ git grep AF_ALG
tc/tc_bpf.c:#ifndef AF_ALG
tc/tc_bpf.c:#define AF_ALG 38
tc/tc_bpf.c: .salg_family = AF_ALG,
tc/tc_bpf.c: cfd = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
tc/tc_bpf.c: fprintf(stderr, "Cannot get AF_ALG socket: %s\n",
Regards,
Nicolas
