>-----Original Message----- >From: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com [mailto:zyjzyj2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:16 AM >To: zyjzyj2...@gmail.com; mkube...@suse.cz; vfal...@gmail.com; >go...@cumulusnetworks.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Shteinbock, Boris (Wind >River); jay.vosbu...@canonical.com; Tantilov, Emil S >Subject: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection > >From: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2...@gmail.com> > >Bonding will utilize notifier callbacks to detect slave >link state changes. It is intended to be used with miimon >set to zero, and does not support the updelay or downdelay >options to bonding. > >Because of link flap from the slave interface, if the notifier >is NETDEV_UP while the actual link state is down, it is not >necessary to continue. > >Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosbu...@canonical.com> >Tested-by: Tantilov, Emil S <emil.s.tanti...@intel.com> >Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2...@gmail.com> >--- > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 317 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- >---- > 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
Just for the record - this is not a patch that I have tested. I did run tests with the patch Jay Vosburgh submitted for introducing notifiers and that is handled in a separate thread. Why do you keep re-sending Jay's patches? Thanks, Emil
