From: One Thousand Gnomes <gno...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 20:25:21 +0000
>> The fact what include/linux/license.h:license_is_gpl_compatible includes >> "Dual MIT/GPL" as an option seems to suggest that it is enough of a thing >> to be validly used as the contents of a MODULE_LICENSE() thing. > > Yes. The MIT licence most definitely exists, and people know what it > means. > > Also nobody should be changing the licence on anything unless they have > the written permission of all rights holders on record, so it's best to > leave it be 8) +1
