>> Move the jump label directly before the desired log statement >> so that the variable "err" will not be checked once more >> after it was determined that a function call failed. >> Use the identifier "report_failure" instead of the label "err". > > Why?
I suggest to reconsider the places with which such a jump label is connected. > The code was smart enough Which action should really be performed after a failure was detected and handled a bit already? * Another condition check * Just additional error logging > and you're making it uglier that it needs to be. I assume that a software development taste can evolve, can't it? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
