Le 24/12/2015 00:52, Pravin B Shelar a écrit :
[snip]
@@ -83,22 +84,12 @@ int ip6_tnl_get_iflink(const struct net_device *dev);
  static inline void ip6tunnel_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
                                  struct net_device *dev)
  {
-       struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
        int pkt_len, err;

        pkt_len = skb->len - skb_inner_network_offset(skb);
        err = ip6_local_out(dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev), sk, skb);
-
-       if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) {
-               struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
-               u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
-               tstats->tx_bytes += pkt_len;
-               tstats->tx_packets++;
-               u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
-               put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
-       } else {
-               stats->tx_errors++;
-               stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
-       }
+       if (likely(!net_xmit_eval(err)))
+               err = pkt_len;
+       iptunnel_xmit_stats(dev, err);
I don't think this is an equivalent change.
For example, if err == NET_XMIT_DROP, then '!net_xmit_eval(err)' is false and
iptunnel_xmit_stats() is called with err set to a positive value (NET_XMIT_DROP
value is 0x01), ie not an error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to