From: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:19:39 -0800

> This patch set starts to address one front in the battle against
> protocol ossification.

Looks good series applied, thanks.

Two things:

1) I'd ask you to reconsider passing that struct with the bit fields into
   the chk routines.  Some cpu ABIs pass that thing as an aggregate on
   the stack.  Whereas if you just use a simple bit mask and BIT(x) values
   we know it's always going to be passed in as an integer or whatever.

2) As per the TCP check, it is definitely more strict now.  But I seriously
   doubt get ever gained anything real with the previous, looser, check.
   Besides, if it bites a user segment we will get a report and can adjust
   things.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to