On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:14:24AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote: > > That creates one more level of indirection. I don't see how add an > atomic replace operation adds any complexity to the rhashtable, none > of the semantics for rhashtable need to be changed.
OK after thinking about it a little bit more I think your approach is safe and we won't need to play any more games to get this to work. So I'm fine with this patch. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
