David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Rainer Weikusat <rweiku...@mobileactivedefense.com>
>> Rainer Weikusat <r...@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Insofar I understand the comment in this code block correctly,
[...]
>>> /* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return
>>> -EAGAIN
>>> * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
>>>
>>> setting a receive timeout for an AF_UNIX datagram socket also doesn't
>>> work as intended because of this: In case of n readers with the same
>>> timeout, the nth reader will end up blocking n times the timeout.
[...]
> So with your patch, the "N * timeout" behavior, where N is the number
> of queues reading threads, no longer occurs? Do they all now properly
> get released at the appropriate timeout?
As far as I can tell, yes. With the change, unix_dgram_recvmsg has a
read loop looking like this:
last = NULL; /* not really necessary */
timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
do {
mutex_lock(&u->readlock);
skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
skb = __skb_try_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &peeked, &skip, &err,
&last);
if (skb)
break;
mutex_unlock(&u->readlock);
if (err != -EAGAIN)
break;
} while (timeo &&
!__skb_wait_for_more_packets(sk, &err, &timeo, last));
u->readlock is only used to enforce serialized access while running code
dealing with the peek offset. If there's currently nothing to receive,
the mutex is dropped. Afterwards, non-blocking readers return with
-EAGAIN and blocking readers go to sleep waiting for 'interesting
events' via __skb_wait_for_more_packets without stuffing the mutex into
a pocket and taking it with them: All non-blocking readers of a certain
socket end up going to sleep via schedule_timeout call in the wait
function, hence, each of them will be woken up once its timeout expires.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
