On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:59:40PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
...
> @@ -2396,6 +2396,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
> scan_control *sc,
>               memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim);
>               do {
>                       unsigned long lru_pages;
> +                     unsigned long reclaimed;
>                       unsigned long scanned;
>                       struct lruvec *lruvec;
>                       int swappiness;
> @@ -2408,6 +2409,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
> scan_control *sc,
>  
>                       lruvec = mem_cgroup_zone_lruvec(zone, memcg);
>                       swappiness = mem_cgroup_swappiness(memcg);
> +                     reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
>                       scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
>  
>                       shrink_lruvec(lruvec, swappiness, sc, &lru_pages);
> @@ -2418,6 +2420,11 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
> scan_control *sc,
>                                           memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
>                                           lru_pages);
>  
> +                     /* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
> +                     vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
> +                                sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> +                                sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
> +

Suppose we have the following cgroup configuration.

A __ B
  \_ C

A is empty (which is natural for the unified hierarchy AFAIU). B has
some workload running in it, and C generates socket pressure. Due to the
socket pressure coming from C we start reclaim in A, which results in
thrashing of B, but we might not put sockets under pressure in A or C,
because vmpressure does not account pages scanned/reclaimed in B when
generating a vmpressure event for A or C. This might result in
aggressive reclaim and thrashing in B w/o generating a signal for C to
stop growing socket buffers.

Do you think such a situation is possible? If so, would it make sense to
switch to post-order walk in shrink_zone and pass sub-tree
scanned/reclaimed stats to vmpressure for each scanned memcg?

Thanks,
Vladimir

>                       /*
>                        * Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
>                        * cgroups to fulfill the overall scan target for the
> @@ -2449,7 +2456,8 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct 
> scan_control *sc,
>                       reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
>               }
>  
> -             vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> +             /* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
> +             vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup, true,
>                          sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
>                          sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed);
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to