On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> wrote: > > > While connlabels provide 128bits of space skb->mark is still only 32 > > bits. Since we are using connection tracking to simply restore skb->mark > > the use of connlabels by itself doesn't solve the problem I outlined > > above. skb->mark would still needs to be increased in size. > > We have ctnetlink which allows direct setting of ctmark/ctlabels.
Can those labels be set early enough in the stack to affect the source address chosen for outgoing connections? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
